Theory and Practice (TAP) features scholars and activists from around the world who can speak with one another about ideas of gender and sexuality from both East and West. This series is in collaboration with the Centre for Studies in Gender and Sexuality, New York University, U.S. and brings together a range of thinkers to address global questions of politics, rhetoric and history. The series is aimed at TAP-ing into critical and creative energies from around the world.
This webinar focused on questions related to the umbrella term of ‘trans’ with respect to sexualities, cultures and borders. ‘Trans-,’ as a prefix suggests movement and boundary-crossing. Most productively, it has also come to denote the mobility and transitions across genders and sexualities. How can we think about trans-ness trans-nationally and trans-culturally?
The panel focused on multiple ways of thinking about cross-border embodiments and movements through gender and sexuality by putting US and Indic understandings of transgendered and transsexual lives in conversation with one another. The session featured C. Riley Snorton, Anindya Hajra and Sayan Bhattacharya
This webinar focused on questions related to the tensions between bodies, sexualities and the law. Any expression of desire and sexuality, in theory and lived experiences, across time and culture, is haunted by the spectre of the law. The laws, supported by the socio-political enforcement of stringent norms, constantly produce bodies and sexualities that become “deviant” and “undesirable.” The most recent manifestations of such laws include one against cross-religious desire in India (commonly referred to as “love jihad”), and the ongoing struggle against abortion bans, and for transgender rights, in the U.S.
At the same time, there has also been an expansion of legal recognition to previously marginalized groups, such as the decriminalization of homosexuality in 2018, and the 2014 judgement regarding transgender persons, in India, and the recent recognition of same-sex marriage in the U.S. How do we make sense of these struggles with the law? This session featured Flavia Agnes, Dean Spade and Rahul Rao.
This webinar focused on questions related to the complex intermeshings of colonialism and sex in relation to the notion of disease. Given the cultural politics surrounding Covid-19 – the racialized health disparities it lays bare, the anxieties around intimacy and contact that it generates – this session sought to provide a longer historical arc through which to view the pandemic crisis. We explored the complex ways in which understandings of health, disease and contagion have been inextricable from anxieties around race and sex, and the sex of the ‘other’ in particular.
In doing so, we contextualized the pandemic crisis and traced its pre-history to earlier moments of cultural anxiety around race, sex, disease and contagion. The session featured Sadia Abbas, Charu Gupta and Nayan Shah in conversation.
This webinar focused on questions around Engendering Caste, Sexualizing Race. Race and caste have been described both as being similar and dissimilar. What the two structures share are long histories of violence that have also been gendered and sexualized. Simultaneously effeminised and hyper-masculinised, both caste and race have made evident the illogics of their governing structures.
This session addressed the broad and complex intersections among caste, race, gender and sex as these concepts continue to inform the cultures and politics of our time. The session featured Sameena Dalwai, Sumit Baudh and Thenmozhi Soundarajan in conversation.